Why These Claims Matter
The decision to medically transition as a minor is one of the most consequential choices a person can make. Some young people who undergo these treatments later come to regret them, facing irreversible physical changes, long-term health complications, and emotional distress. Despite these serious risks, medical institutions have aggressively pushed gender-affirming interventions—including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries—on minors, often without adequate oversight, informed consent, or high-quality scientific evidence to justify their use.
A growing number of studies and expert reviews have revealed major flaws in the way gender medicine has been practiced. Countries like the UK, Sweden, and Finland have already reversed course, limiting medical transitions for minors due to concerns over safety, ethics, and the lack of long-term benefit.
These nations now prioritize psychological and holistic approaches to treating gender distress in young people. Yet in the United States, many hospitals and clinics continue to offer these life-altering treatments to children and adolescents, despite mounting evidence that they may cause more harm than good.
If you or a loved one were encouraged or pressured into a medical transition as a minor, you may have legal options. These claims aim to hold medical professionals accountable for failing to uphold informed consent standards and for exposing vulnerable young people to irreversible harm.
Our Commitment to Protecting Minors
We are dedicated to representing individuals who underwent gender transition medical procedures as minors. Minors are among the most vulnerable in our society. And those who transition are actually struggling with autism, depression, body dysmorphia, and past traumas. Our goal is to ensure they receive the highest standard of care and are not subjected to medical interventions without proper safeguards.
We take no position on the choices adults make for themselves. Our focus is on ensuring that minors receive evidence-based medical care, that their rights are protected, and that medical professionals are held accountable when they fail in their duty.
What the Science Says
Recent systematic reviews of gender medicine for minors have raised serious red flags about the evidence base supporting these treatments. Key findings include:
-
Weak Evidence for Benefits: Every systematic review of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries for minors has concluded that the evidence supporting their use is of low or very low quality.
-
High Risk of Regret and Detransition: Many individuals who transitioned as minors later experience regret and face major health complications from their treatments.
-
Irreversible Side Effects: Puberty blockers can cause lasting bone density issues, cognitive development delays, and infertility. Cross-sex hormones significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and sterility.
-
Psychological Harm: Despite claims that medical transition prevents suicide, there is no reliable evidence proving that puberty blockers or hormones reduce suicidality in minors. In some cases, long-term mental health outcomes worsen.
The UK’s Cass Review—a landmark investigation into gender medicine—found that these treatments were built on “shaky foundations” and lacked sufficient scientific backing. This finding has led to major policy changes in several European countries, yet many U.S. hospitals continue to provide these interventions without adequate safeguards.
The Financial Motive
Hospitals and medical institutions profit significantly from gender-related treatments. Once a young person starts on puberty blockers or hormones, they often require lifelong medical care. Some of the hidden financial incentives behind these treatments include:
-
Lifelong Patients: A minor who starts hormone therapy will likely need continuous medical monitoring, additional hormone prescriptions, and surgeries throughout their lifetime.
-
Insurance and Government Funding: Many gender clinics and hospitals receive large sums from insurance companies and government programs for providing gender-affirming care.
-
Medical Industry Influence: Pharmaceutical companies benefit from increased hormone prescriptions, while surgeons profit from costly gender-affirming procedures.
While hospitals claim to prioritize the well-being of gender-distressed youth, the reality is that many stand to gain financially from keeping patients on a medicalized pathway.
Your Rights Matter
If you were given puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, or underwent surgery as a minor without full and informed consent, you may have a case. Holding medical institutions accountable is not just about justice—it’s about preventing this from happening to others.
If you want to learn more, contact us today for a free case evaluation.
Understanding the Legal Process
If you are considering legal action, it’s important to understand what a lawsuit entails. Below are common steps in the legal process:
-
Initial Consultation: A lawyer will review your case, including medical records and personal experiences, to determine if you have grounds for a claim.
-
Filing a Lawsuit: If your case moves forward, attorneys will file a lawsuit against the medical providers and institutions responsible for your care.
-
Discovery Phase: Both sides exchange evidence, including medical records, expert testimony, and internal communications from medical institutions.
-
Depositions: You and key witnesses may be asked to give sworn testimony about your experiences.
-
Settlement or Trial: Most cases settle before trial, but, if necessary, your case could go before a judge or jury.
-
Potential Compensation: Successful lawsuits can result in financial compensation for medical expenses, emotional distress, and future healthcare needs.
